AI’s Hidden Cost: How to Audit Your Microsoft 365 Copilot Usage to Avoid Massive Licensing Waste

Tanya Wetson-Catt • 2 February 2026

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has taken the business world by storm, pushing organisations of all sizes to adopt new tools that boost efficiency and sharpen their competitive edge. Among these tools, Microsoft 365 Copilot rises to the top, offering powerful productivity support through its seamless integration with the familiar Office 365 environment.

In the push to adopt new technologies and boost productivity, many businesses buy licenses for every employee without much consideration. That enthusiasm often leads to “shelfware”, AI tools and software that go unused while the company continues to pay for them. Given the high cost of these solutions, it’s essential to invest in a way that actually delivers a return on investment.

Because you can’t improve what you don’t measure, a Microsoft 365 Copilot audit is essential for assessing and quantifying your adoption rates. A thorough review shows who is truly benefiting from and actively using the technology. It also guides smarter licensing decisions that reduce costs and improve overall efficiency.

The Reality of AI Licensing Waste

Implementing automated access revocation for contractors is not just about better security; it's a critical component of financial risk management and regulatory compliance. The biggest risk in contractor management is relying on human memory to manually delete accounts and revoke permissions after a project ends. Forgotten accounts with lingering access, often referred to as “dormant” or “ghost” accounts, are a prime target for cyber-attackers. If an attacker compromises a dormant account, they can operate inside your network without detection, as no one is monitoring an "inactive" user.

For example, many security reports cite the Target data breach in 2013 as a stark illustration. Attackers gained initial entry into Target's network by compromising the credentials of a third-party HVAC contractor that had legitimate, yet overly permissive, access to the network for billing purposes. If Target had enforced the principle of least privilege, limiting the vendor's access only to the necessary billing system, the lateral movement that compromised millions of customer records could have been contained or prevented entirely.

By leveraging Microsoft Entra Conditional Access to set a sign-in frequency and instantly revoke access when a contractor is removed from the security group, you eliminate the chance of lingering permissions. This automation ensures that you are consistently applying the principle of least privilege, significantly reducing your attack surface and demonstrating due diligence for auditors under regulations like GDPR or HIPAA. It turns a high-risk, manual task into a reliable, self-managing syAt first, buying licenses in bulk may seem like a convenient strategy since it simplifies the procurement process for your IT department. However, this collective approach often ignores actual user behaviour, since not every role needs the advanced features offered by Copilot.

AI licensing waste occurs when tools sit unused on employee dashboards. For example, a receptionist may have no need for advanced data-analysis capabilities, while a field technician might never open the desktop application at all.

Paying for unused licenses drains your budget, so identifying and closing these gaps is essential to protecting your bottom line. The savings can then be redirected to higher-value initiatives where they’ll make the greatest impact.

Analysing User Activity Reports

Fortunately, Microsoft includes built-in tools that make it easy to view your AI usage data. The Microsoft 365 admin centre is the best place to start. From there, you can generate reports that track active usage over specific time periods and give you a clear view of engagement.

From this dashboard, you can track various metrics such as enabled users, active users, adoption rates, trends, and so on. This makes it easy to identify employees who have never used AI features, or those whose limited usage may not justify the licensing cost.

This kind of software usage tracking allows you to make data-driven decisions and distinguish between power users and those who ignore the tool. This clarity not only allows for making efficient license purchases, but also sets the stage for having conversations with department heads to determine why certain teams do not engage with AI tools.

Strategies for IT Budget Optimisation

Once you identify the waste, the next step is taking action. Start by reclaiming licenses from inactive users and reallocating them to employees who actually need them. This simple shift, making sure licenses go to those who use them, can significantly reduce your subscription costs.

Establish a formal request process for Copilot licenses. This ensures employees must justify their need for the tool, granting access only to those who truly require it and adding accountability to your spending.

IT budget optimisation isn’t a one-time task; it’s an ongoing process that requires continuous refinement. Regularly reviewing these metrics, whether monthly or quarterly, helps keep your software spending efficient and under control.

Boosting Adoption Through Training

Low AI tool usage isn’t always about lack of interest. Sometimes, employees simply don’t need the tool, while other times they avoid it because they don’t know how to use it, insufficient training can lead to frustration and poor adoption. This means that cutting licenses alone isn’t enough; investing in user training is equally important.

The most effective approach is to survey staff and assess their comfort level with Copilot. For employees who find it confusing, provide self-paced tutorials or conduct training workshops that demonstrate practical use cases relevant to their daily tasks. When employees see clear value and convenience, they are much more likely to adopt the tool.

Consider the following steps to improve adoption:

Host lunch-and-learn sessions to demonstrate key features
Share success stories from power users within the company
Create a library of quick tip videos for common tasks
Appoint “Copilot Champions” in each department to help others

Investing in training often transforms low usage into high value, turning what was once a wasted expense into a productivity-enhancing asset.

Establishing a Governance Policy

Another way to minimise Copilot license waste involves setting rules for how your company handles AI tools. A governance policy effectively brings order to your software management by outlining who qualifies for a license and setting expectations for usage and review cycles.

The policy should also define criteria based on job roles and responsibilities. For instance, content creators and data analysts get automatic access, while other roles might require manager approval, thus preventing the “free-for-all” mentality that leads to waste.

The policy should be clearly communicated to all employees to ensure transparency regarding how decisions are being made. This way, a culture of responsibility regarding company resources is established.

Preparing for Renewal Season

The worst time to check your Copilot AI usage is the day before renewal. Instead, schedule audits at least 90 days in advance to allow ample time to adjust your contract and license counts.

This also gives you leverage during negotiations with vendors. By presenting data showing your actual needs, you put yourself in a strong position to right-size your contract and avoid getting locked into another year of paying for shelfware.

Smart Management Matters

Managing modern software costs demands both vigilance and data, particularly as most vendors move to subscription-based models for AI and software tools. With recurring expenses, letting subscriptions run unchecked is no longer an option. Regular Microsoft 365 Copilot audits safeguard your budget and ensure efficiency by aligning technology purchases with actual usage.

Take control of your licensing strategy today. Look at the numbers, ask the hard questions, and ensure every dollar you spend contributes to your business’ growth. Smart management leads to a leaner and more productive organisation.

Are you ready to get a handle on your AI tool spending? Reach out to our team for help with comprehensive Microsoft 365 Copilot audits, and eliminate waste from your IT budget. Contact us today to schedule your consultation.

Let's Talk Tech

< Older Post

Newer Post >

More from our blog

Micro-SaaS Vetting: The 5-Minute Security Check for Browser Add-ons

by Tanya Wetson-Catt • 25 May 2026

Browser add-ons have a funny reputation. They feel “small”. A quick install. A tiny productivity boost. A harmless little helper that lives in your toolbar. But in practice, a browser extension is more like a micro-SaaS vendor sitting inside your browser session. It can see what you see, interact with the pages you open, and sometimes access the same cloud apps your business runs on all day. That’s why a browser extension security check matters. Not because every extension is bad, but because it only takes one over-permissioned add-on or one bad update to turn “helpful” into exposure. The good news is you don’t need a 40-page policy to reduce the risk. A simple five-minute check can prevent most extension problems before they start. Why Browser Extensions Are a High-Leverage Risk Browser extensions sit in the most sensitive place in modern work: the browser tab where your staff live all day. That matters because extensions aren’t just “apps”. They’re granted special authorisations inside the browser. That makes them attractive targets and gives them leverage that’s disproportionate to how “small” they feel. UC Berkeley’s guidance says extensions get “special authorisations,” and the more you install, the bigger the attack surface becomes. The risk is often permission-based. OWASP calls out “permissions overreach” as a core problem. Extensions can request more access than they need, including access to “all tabs, browsing history, and even sensitive user data.” When an extension can read and modify what happens in the browser, it can potentially see data in cloud tools, capture what’s typed into forms, or alter content on a page. It’s also a “change over time” risk. A useful extension today can become a different extension tomorrow. The 5-Minute Browser Extension Security Check This browser extension security check is designed to be fast, repeatable, and realistic. It helps staff make safe decisions in minutes without turning every extension into a big IT ticket. Vet the developer like a real vendor If you wouldn’t give a random supplier access to your customer records, don’t give a random extension access to your browser. Start with the basics: Confirm the developer has a real website, support details, and a consistent name across listings Look for a track record (other products, a clear company presence, updates that look normal) Prefer official stores and trusted sources over “download this .zip” links

LinkedIn "Social Engineering": Protecting Your Staff from Fake Recruitment Scams

by Tanya Wetson-Catt • 22 May 2026

A fake recruiter message is one of the cleanest social engineering tricks around because it doesn’t look like a trick. That’s why LinkedIn recruitment scams work so well inside real businesses. They don’t arrive as malware. They arrive as a normal conversation that nudges someone toward one small action: click this link, open this file, “verify” this detail, move the chat to a different app. A few simple checks, a couple of hard-stop rules, and an easy way to report suspicious outreach can shut these scams down without slowing anyone down. LinkedIn Recruitment Scams LinkedIn recruitment scams artfully blend into normal professional behaviour. The message doesn’t look like a “cyber attack.” It looks like networking, and it borrows credibility from recognisable brands, polished profiles, and familiar hiring language. At platform scale, the volume is also hard to wrap your head around. Rest of World reports that LinkedIn said it “identified and removed 80.6 million fake accounts” at registration from July to December 2024. A LinkedIn spokesperson claimed “over 99%” of the fake accounts they remove are detected proactively before anyone reports them. Even with that level of detection, enough scam activity still leaks through to reach real employees. That’s especially true when scammers tailor their approach to what looks credible in a specific industry and location. The other reason these scams succeed is that they follow a predictable persuasion pattern: urgency, authority, and a quick push to “do the next step.” The FTC describes scammers impersonating well-known companies and then steering targets toward actions that create leverage. These actions include handing over sensitive personal information or sending money for “equipment” or other upfront costs. Once someone is rushed into treating the process as real, the scam doesn’t need to be technically sophisticated. It just needs the victim to keep moving. The Scam Pattern Most Teams Miss 1. A polished approach on LinkedIn The profile looks credible enough, the role sounds plausible, and the message is written in a professional tone. The job post itself may still be oddly generic, though. Amoria Bond notes that fake job postings often “lack details” and lean on broad language to catch as many people as possible. 2. A quick push off-platform The conversation shifts to email, WhatsApp/Telegram, or a “recruitment portal” link. That shift is important because it removes the built-in friction of LinkedIn’s environment and makes it easier to send links, files, and instructions.

3. A credibility wrapper: “assessment”, “interview pack”, or “onboarding”

Airswift flags link/attachment requests and urgency tactics as common red flags. The story is usually something like: “Download this assessment,” “Review these onboarding steps,” or “Log in here to schedule.” Tag Apps Make decisions visible and repeatable by tagging apps. Microsoft explicitly calls tagging apps as sanctioned or unsanctioned an important step, because it lets you filter, track progress, and drive consistent action over time. 4. The pivot: money, sensitive info, or account takeover Scammers impersonate well-known companies and then ask for things legitimate employers typically don’t: payment for “equipment” or early requests for personal information. Another variation is more subtle: “verification” steps that are really designed to steal identity details or compromise accounts. 5. Pressure to keep moving If someone hesitates, the scam leans on urgency: “limited slots,” “fast-track hiring,” “complete this today.” That’s why Forbes frames the key skill as slowing down and checking details, because the scam depends on momentum. Red Flags Checklist for Staff Here are the red flags to look out for. Red flags in the job posting The role is oddly vague or overly broad. Generic responsibilities, unclear reporting lines, and “we’ll share details later” language are common in fake listings. The company's presence doesn’t match the brand name. Thin company pages, inconsistent logos/branding, or a web presence that feels incomplete are worth pausing on. The process is “too easy, too fast.” If the listing implies immediate hiring with minimal steps, treat it as suspicious. Red flags in recruiter behaviour They push you off LinkedIn quickly. Moving to WhatsApp/Telegram or personal email early is a common tactic. They use a personal email address or unusual contact details. Be specifically cautious of recruiters using free webmail accounts instead of a company domain. They avoid verification. If they dodge basic questions, treat that as a signal, not a scheduling issue Hard-stop requests Any request for money or fees. Application fees, equipment purchases, “training costs”, gift cards, crypto, that’s a hard stop. Requests for sensitive personal info early. Bank details, identity documents, tax forms, or “background checks” before a real interview process is established. Requests for verification codes. If anyone asks you to read back a one-time code sent to your phone/email, assume they’re trying to take over an account. Requests for non-public company information like org charts, internal system details, client lists, invoice processes and security tools. Look out for requisitions for anything beyond what a recruiter would reasonably need. Stop Scams With Simple Defaults LinkedIn recruitment scams don’t succeed because staff are careless. They succeed because the outreach looks normal, the process feels familiar, and the next step is always framed as urgent. The fix isn’t turning everyone into an investigator. It’s setting simple defaults that make scams harder to complete: slow down before clicking, verify the recruiter and role through official channels, keep conversations on-platform until identity checks out, and treat money requests, code requests, and early personal data demands as hard stops. When those habits are standardised, the scam loses its leverage.

The "Legacy Debt" Audit: Identifying the 3 Oldest Risks in Your Server Room

by Tanya Wetson-Catt • 18 May 2026

The most dangerous thing in a server room is often the phrase, “Don’t touch that.” It’s usually said with a half-joke and a grimace. It refers to the old box that “still works”, runs something important, and has survived so many fixes and workarounds that nobody feels confident changing it anymore. That’s legacy debt. Not just “old tech”, but old tech that’s become a dependency. It’s the kind that quietly accumulates risk until it turns into downtime, security exposure, or an emergency upgrade at the worst possible time. A legacy debt audit is the fast way to bring that risk back into the light. What Legacy Debt Really Looks Like Legacy debt isn’t “old gear”. It’s old gear that has become normal. It’s the server that runs a critical app, the edge device nobody remembers buying, the workaround that turned into a dependency. Over time, that debt stacks up quietly. Infinite Lambda describes legacy debt as something that “happens even to the best systems,” “silently accruing costs and constraints,” and it can “accumulate basically unnoticed until it is too costly to ignore.” That’s why a legacy debt audit isn’t a theoretical exercise. It’s a visibility exercise to bring the oldest, highest-leverage risks back onto the list of things you actively manage. The security problem shows up when “old” becomes “unpatchable.” The UK’s NCSC guidance on obsolete products says, “Ideally, once out of date, technology should not be used,” and “the only fully effective way to mitigate this risk is to stop using the obsolete product.” If something can’t be updated, weaknesses don’t age out. They sit there, waiting for the wrong day. Legacy debt also looks like basic server hygiene slipping. NIST SP 800-123 frames secure server operations as an ongoing process: “Maintaining the secure configuration through application of appropriate patches and upgrades, security testing, monitoring of logs, and backups…” It also calls out foundational hardening steps like “Patch and upgrade the operating system” and “Remove or disable unnecessary services, applications, and network protocols.” When those basics become inconsistent, legacy debt turns into a reliability and incident-response problem, not just a security one. Finally, legacy debt often hides at the edge. If you have end-of-support internet-facing devices, you’ve got high-leverage risk in the most exposed place. The 3 Oldest Risks to Find First These three categories are where “old” most often turns into outsized risk, because they combine age with leverage: they either sit at the front door, can’t be fixed anymore, or have quietly drifted out of a safe baseline. Risk #1: End-of-support edge devices If you’re looking for high-leverage legacy debt, start at the edge. Firewalls, VPN gateways, routers, and other internet-facing devices are the front door to your environment. When they reach end-of-support (EOS), they don’t just become outdated. They become harder to defend because security fixes stop arriving. What to check in your audit List every edge device (firewall, VPN, router) and the support status for each one Confirm which ones are internet-facing and which services are exposed Identify devices that can’t run the current firmware or no longer receive updates. Risk #2: Obsolete products that can’t be fixed anymore Obsolete products are the purest form of legacy debt: things that are still operating but no longer receive security updates. That means every new vulnerability becomes permanent. In other words, there’s no clever workaround that makes an unsupported system “safe”. There are only risk reductions until you can replace it. What to check in your audit Identify anything past support: server OS versions, appliances, old hypervisors, and line-of-business apps Flag systems that require exceptions, like the ones with old protocols, weak auth, and special firewall rules Find the “business-critical but unsupported” systems. Risk #3: “It still works” servers with neglected basics This is the sneakiest risk because it looks normal. The server is supported. The hardware runs. Nobody’s complaining. But the basics have drifted: patching is inconsistent, unnecessary services are still running, and backups haven’t been proven under pressure. SP 800-123 Guide to General Server Security frames secure server operations as an ongoing discipline, including “patches and upgrades,” “monitoring of logs,” and “backups.” It also calls out core hardening steps like “Patch and upgrade the operating system” and “Remove or disable unnecessary services, applications, and network protocols.” Those are the unglamorous fundamentals that stop small problems from turning into long outages. What to check in your audit Patch reality: what’s the current patch level and how often do updates slip? Service sprawl: what’s running that doesn’t need to be running? Admin and service accounts: where are the broad permissions and shared credentials? Backup confidence: when was the last restore test and did it succeed? Change control: who can make changes, and how are they tracked? Stop Carrying Silent Risk Legacy debt doesn’t announce itself. It sits quietly in the background until the day it becomes downtime, exposure, or an emergency upgrade you didn’t plan for. A legacy debt audit gives you control back by turning “we should deal with that someday” into a shortlist you can act on. Start with the highest-leverage risks: end-of-support edge devices, obsolete products that can’t be patched, and servers where the basics have drifted. Then assign owners, set dates, and move one item at a time from “too scary to touch” to “handled”. Contact us for help running your next legacy debt audit.